Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.

59 S.E. 826, 3 Ga. App. 295, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 625

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 20, 1907

Docket792

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 S.E. 826 (Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co., 59 S.E. 826, 3 Ga. App. 295, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 625 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. The failure of the plaintiff in error to file supersedeas bond or pauper affidavit is not ground for dismissal of the writ of error.

2. The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the garnishment proceedings; but did err in rendering judgment against the garnishee, for the reasons given in Fagan v. Jackson, 1 Ga. App. 24 (57 S. E. 1052), and cit., and in Ingram v. Jackson Mercantile Co., 2 Ga. App. 218 (58 S. E. 372). Judgment reversed.

Appeal, from Berrien superior court — Judge Mitchell. September 16, 1907.

Submitted December 18, Decided December 20, 1907. Hendricks & Christian, for plaintiff in error. Alexander & Gary, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI