Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.

Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.

59 S.E. 826, 3 Ga. App. 295, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 625
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 20, 1907·No. 792·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. The failure of the plaintiff in error to file supersedeas bond or pauper affidavit is not ground for dismissal of the writ of error.

2. The court did not err in refusing to dismiss the garnishment proceedings; but did err in rendering judgment against the garnishee, for the reasons given in Fagan v. Jackson, 1 Ga. App. 24 (57 S. E. 1052), and cit., and in Ingram v. Jackson Mercantile Co., 2 Ga. App. 218 (58 S. E. 372). Judgment reversed.

Appeal, from Berrien superior court — Judge Mitchell. September 16, 1907. Submitted December 18, Decided December 20, 1907. Hendricks & Christian, for plaintiff in error. Alexander & Gary, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co., 59 S.E. 826, 3 Ga. App. 295, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 625 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

59 S.E. 826 (Bridges & Joiner v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeBarry v. State
116 S.E. 656 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Spooner v. Coachman
90 S.E. 373 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)