Bridger Christopher Wilson v. The State of Wyoming
This text of 2025 WY 68 (Bridger Christopher Wilson v. The State of Wyoming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
2025 WY 68
April Term, A.D. 2025
June 18, 2025
BRIDGER CHRISTOPHER WILSON,
Appellant (Defendant),
v. S-25-0062
THE STATE OF WYOMING,
Appellee (Plaintiff).
ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S SENTENCING ORDER [¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief in the time allotted. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional guilty plea to one felony count of theft in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3-402(a) and (c)(i). For this count, the district court imposed a 3 to 5 year sentence of incarceration suspended in favor of three years of supervised probation. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s Judgment, Sentence and Probation Order.
[¶2] On April 16, 2025, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel e-filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered an Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief. This Court ordered that Appellant was permitted to file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like the Court to consider in this appeal. This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal. Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted.
[¶3] Now, following a careful review of the Anders brief submitted by appellate counsel, and the record, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s Judgment, Sentence and Probation Order should be affirmed. It is, therefore,
[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Bridger Christopher Wilson, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further
[¶5] ORDERED that the Park County District Court’s November 27, 2024, Judgment, Sentence and Probation Order be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.
[¶6] DATED this 18th day of June, 2025.
BY THE COURT*:
/s/
LYNNE BOOMGAARDEN *Justice Hill recused Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 WY 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridger-christopher-wilson-v-the-state-of-wyoming-wyo-2025.