BRIDGEPORT HARBOUR PLACE I, LLC v. Ganim

31 A.3d 1180, 303 Conn. 905, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 488

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in BRIDGEPORT HARBOUR PLACE I, LLC v. Ganim. Read the opinion of the Court — 303 Conn. 904 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 17, 2011·No. SC 18888·Published

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn. App. 99 (AC 30549), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Did the Appellate Court properly refrain from considering the issue raised by the named defendant regarding the award of punitive damages because of the named defendant’s failure to seek an articulation of the trial court’s decision? If the answer is ‘no,’ did the trial court properly award punitive damages in this case?”

ROGERS, C. J., and NORCOTT and EVELEIGH, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn. App. 99 (AC 30549), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Did the Appellate Court properly refrain from considering the issue raised by the named defendant regarding the award of punitive damages because of the named defendant’s failure to seek an articulation of the trial court’s decision? If the answer is ‘no,’ did the trial court properly award punitive damages in this case?”

ROGERS, C. J., and NORCOTT and EVELEIGH, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

BRIDGEPORT HARBOUR PLACE I, LLC v. Ganim, 31 A.3d 1180, 303 Conn. 905, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 488 (Colo. 2011).

Pincite

31 A.3d 1180 (BRIDGEPORT HARBOUR PLACE I, LLC v. Ganim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. Ganim

30 A.3d 703 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)

Opinion

Related