Bridgeport Brass Co. v. Feuser & Sullivan, Inc.
Opinion
The appeal is from an order denying an application for counsel fee in resisting an adjudication of insolvency, and from an order denying a claim for alleged services in collecting certain accounts receivable of .the defendant corporation.
A careful examination of the record satisfies us that the orders complained of were entered pursuant to the exercise of a sound discretion and they are, therefore, affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perseie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
184 A. 523 (Bridgeport Brass Co. v. Feuser & Sullivan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.