Bridgeport Brass Co. v. Feuser & Sullivan, Inc.
This text of 184 A. 523 (Bridgeport Brass Co. v. Feuser & Sullivan, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal is from an order denying an application for counsel fee in resisting an adjudication of insolvency, and from an order denying a claim for alleged services in collecting certain accounts receivable of .the defendant corporation.
A careful examination of the record satisfies us that the orders complained of were entered pursuant to the exercise of a sound discretion and they are, therefore, affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perseie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 A. 523, 120 N.J. Eq. 200, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridgeport-brass-co-v-feuser-sullivan-inc-nj-1936.