Bridgemarket Associates v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bridgemarket Associates v. City of New York

190 A.D.2d 561, 593 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1039

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 9, 1993·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered October 9, 1991, which denied defendants’ motion for a stay of this action pending exhaustion of appellate remedies in Sutton Area Community v City of New York (190 AD2d 562 [decided herewith]), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

These two actions, while arising from the same set of [562] transactions, do not have complete identity of parties and causes of action, and thus a stay under CPLR 2201 is not warranted (Hope’s Windows v Albro Metal Prods. Corp., 93 AD2d 711, 712, appeal dismissed 59 NY2d 968). Concur— Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered October 9, 1991, which denied defendants’ motion for a stay of this action pending exhaustion of appellate remedies in Sutton Area Community v City of New York (190 AD2d 562 [decided herewith]), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

These two actions, while arising from the same set of [562] transactions, do not have complete identity of parties and causes of action, and thus a stay under CPLR 2201 is not warranted (Hope’s Windows v Albro Metal Prods. Corp., 93 AD2d 711, 712, appeal dismissed 59 NY2d 968). Concur— Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Bridgemarket Associates v. City of New York, 190 A.D.2d 561, 593 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1039 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

190 A.D.2d 561 (Bridgemarket Associates v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related