Bridgemarket Associates v. City of New York
This text of 190 A.D.2d 561 (Bridgemarket Associates v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.), entered October 9, 1991, which denied defendants’ motion for a stay of this action pending exhaustion of appellate remedies in Sutton Area Community v City of New York (190 AD2d 562 [decided herewith]), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
These two actions, while arising from the same set of [562]*562transactions, do not have complete identity of parties and causes of action, and thus a stay under CPLR 2201 is not warranted (Hope’s Windows v Albro Metal Prods. Corp., 93 AD2d 711, 712, appeal dismissed 59 NY2d 968). Concur— Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 A.D.2d 561, 593 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridgemarket-associates-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1993.