Bridge Properties, Inc. v. Securitas Realty Corp.

185 Misc. 348, 57 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2352
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedJuly 16, 1945
StatusPublished

This text of 185 Misc. 348 (Bridge Properties, Inc. v. Securitas Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bridge Properties, Inc. v. Securitas Realty Corp., 185 Misc. 348, 57 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2352 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1945).

Opinion

Kahn, J.

Motion to vacate taxation of costs is granted. Upon removal to this court the action became a City Court action. As the order allowing removal did not provide for Municipal Court costs there is no basis for taxing such costs. The costs here involved are statutory, and there is no room for the exercise, of discretion. Therefore, I cannot agree with the decision in Saraceno v. Eastern Cab Co., Inc. (168 Misc. 631). (See Gwizdak v. Netherland Cab Co., 51 N. Y. S. 2d 560, and cases there cited.)

The sum of $79.75, costs taxed as aforesaid, .will be credited upon the judgment and upon any execution issued thereunder. When the judgment creditor collects the amount of the actual recovery, $95, the judgment shall be deemed paid in full and shall be satisfied of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saraceno v. Eastern Cab Co.
168 Misc. 631 (New York Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 Misc. 348, 57 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridge-properties-inc-v-securitas-realty-corp-nynyccityct-1945.