Bridge Hardware Co. v. Trager

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bridge Hardware Co. v. Trager

1 A.D.2d 823, 148 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6248

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 823 (Bridge Hardware Co. v. Trager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bridge Hardware Co. v. Trager, 1 A.D.2d 823, 148 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6248 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting leave to increase the damages claimed in the complaint, unanimously reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion denied, without prejudice to a new application upon proper papers. The moving papers contain only eonelusory statements by one who is not shown to have knowledge of the facts. Proper papers would require averment by a person or persons, shown to have knowledge of the facts, and detailing the dates when the strike began and when it ended, when the facts were first learned of the claimed increased damages and the circumstances under which such knowledge was acquired. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Botein, Cox and Frank, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting leave to increase the damages claimed in the complaint, unanimously reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion denied, without prejudice to a new application upon proper papers. The moving papers contain only eonelusory statements by one who is not shown to have knowledge of the facts. Proper papers would require averment by a person or persons, shown to have knowledge of the facts, and detailing the dates when the strike began and when it ended, when the facts were first learned of the claimed increased damages and the circumstances under which such knowledge was acquired. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Botein, Cox and Frank, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 823, 148 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridge-hardware-co-v-trager-nyappdiv-1956.