BRIDGE GOLDE v. PIX REALTY, LP
This text of BRIDGE GOLDE v. PIX REALTY, LP (BRIDGE GOLDE v. PIX REALTY, LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 2, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-45 Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-2132CC & 19-171 AP ________________
Bridgé Golde, Appellant,
vs.
Pix Realty, L.P., Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Milena Abreu, Judge.
Bridgé Golde, in proper person.
Nexterra Law, and Steven M. Liberty and Eric A. Jacobs, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 83.232(5), Fla. Stat. (2019) (“Failure of the tenant to
pay the rent into the court registry pursuant to court order shall be deemed
an absolute waiver of the tenant’s defenses. In such case, the landlord is
entitled to an immediate default for possession without further notice or
hearing thereon.”); DTRS Intercontinental Mia., LLC v. A.K. Gift Shop, Inc.,
77 So. 3d 785, 786–87 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (in holding that landlord was
entitled to an immediate writ of possession where tenant failed to timely
deposit the specified rent into the court registry, stating that “trial courts have
no discretion in entering an immediate default for possession under these
circumstances. The trial court may not consider the reasons why the deposit
was not timely made” (quoting Park Adult Residential Facility, Inc. v. Dan
Designs, Inc., 36 So. 3d 811, 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010))).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BRIDGE GOLDE v. PIX REALTY, LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridge-golde-v-pix-realty-lp-fladistctapp-2021.