BRIDGE GOLDE v. PIX REALTY, LP

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 2, 2021
Docket21-0045
StatusPublished

This text of BRIDGE GOLDE v. PIX REALTY, LP (BRIDGE GOLDE v. PIX REALTY, LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BRIDGE GOLDE v. PIX REALTY, LP, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 2, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-45 Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-2132CC & 19-171 AP ________________

Bridgé Golde, Appellant,

vs.

Pix Realty, L.P., Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Milena Abreu, Judge.

Bridgé Golde, in proper person.

Nexterra Law, and Steven M. Liberty and Eric A. Jacobs, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 83.232(5), Fla. Stat. (2019) (“Failure of the tenant to

pay the rent into the court registry pursuant to court order shall be deemed

an absolute waiver of the tenant’s defenses. In such case, the landlord is

entitled to an immediate default for possession without further notice or

hearing thereon.”); DTRS Intercontinental Mia., LLC v. A.K. Gift Shop, Inc.,

77 So. 3d 785, 786–87 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (in holding that landlord was

entitled to an immediate writ of possession where tenant failed to timely

deposit the specified rent into the court registry, stating that “trial courts have

no discretion in entering an immediate default for possession under these

circumstances. The trial court may not consider the reasons why the deposit

was not timely made” (quoting Park Adult Residential Facility, Inc. v. Dan

Designs, Inc., 36 So. 3d 811, 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Park Adult Residential Facility, Inc. v. Dan Designs, Inc.
36 So. 3d 811 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
DTRS Intercontinental Miami, LLC v. A.K. Gift Shop, Inc.
77 So. 3d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BRIDGE GOLDE v. PIX REALTY, LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridge-golde-v-pix-realty-lp-fladistctapp-2021.