Bridge Corporation of America v. The American Contract Bridge League, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Bridge Corporation of America v. The American Contract Bridge League, Inc.

366 F.2d 779, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4736, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,900

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 12, 1966·No. 20756·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude the allegations of the first two causes of action in plaintiff’s amended complaint are sufficient to describe interstate commerce of a type not necessarily exempted from the thrust of federal and state antitrust statutes; and that the third cause of action does not contain allegations on its face which preclude plaintiff from raising issues of fact with respect thereto.

The dismissal of the three causes of action is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude the allegations of the first two causes of action in plaintiff’s amended complaint are sufficient to describe interstate commerce of a type not necessarily exempted from the thrust of federal and state antitrust statutes; and that the third cause of action does not contain allegations on its face which preclude plaintiff from raising issues of fact with respect thereto.

The dismissal of the three causes of action is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Bridge Corporation of America v. The American Contract Bridge League, Inc., 366 F.2d 779, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 4736, 1966 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,900 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

366 F.2d 779 (Bridge Corporation of America v. The American Contract Bridge League, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related