Bridge & Co. v. McCullough's Adm'rs
27 Ala. 661
Opinion
Wo have re-examined the points decided in Smith & Co. v. Mallory’s Ex’r, 24 Ala. 628, and are fully con[663]*663vinced that they were well considered, and correctly decided. Upon tbe authority of that case, we must affirm the decrees in the two cases now under consideration. The action of the court below, in all respects, was authorized by law, and we cannot sustain the objections thereto made by the appellant.
Decree in each case affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bridge & Co. v. McCullough's Adm'rs, 27 Ala. 661 (Ala. 1855).
27 Ala. 661 (Bridge & Co. v. McCullough's Adm'rs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Johnson & Lattimer
61 So. 34 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Claflin & Co. v. Behr's Adm'r
89 Ala. 503 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)
Bowen v. Billings, Boise & Co.
13 Neb. 439 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1882)
Warren v. Taylor
60 Ala. 218 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Rodgers v. Meranda
7 Ohio St. (N.S.) 179 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1857)