Bridenbecker v. Bridenbecker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bridenbecker v. Bridenbecker

81 N.Y.S. 1119

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 81 N.Y.S. 1119 (Bridenbecker v. Bridenbecker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bridenbecker v. Bridenbecker, 81 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with costs. Held, that the affidavits presented upon the motion for new trial do not sufficiently establish that the plaintiff’s failure to learn of the proposed new evidence was not due to lack of reasonable care and diligence upon her part; also- held, that said evidence is incompetent, but, even if competent, would not, in our opinion, be sufficient to produce a result different from that which prevailed upon the trial already held. See 77 N. Y. Supp. 802.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with costs, and motion denied, with costs. Held, that the affidavits presented upon the motion for new trial do not sufficiently establish that the plaintiff’s failure to learn of the proposed new evidence was not due to lack of reasonable care and diligence upon her part; also- held, that said evidence is incompetent, but, even if competent, would not, in our opinion, be sufficient to produce a result different from that which prevailed upon the trial already held. See 77 N. Y. Supp. 802.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 N.Y.S. 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridenbecker-v-bridenbecker-nyappdiv-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack