Brickmasons, Inc. v. Bermark Construction Corp.

53 Misc. 2d 158, 278 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1688
CourtNassau County District Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1967
StatusPublished

This text of 53 Misc. 2d 158 (Brickmasons, Inc. v. Bermark Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nassau County District Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brickmasons, Inc. v. Bermark Construction Corp., 53 Misc. 2d 158, 278 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1688 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1967).

Opinion

John S. Lockman, J.

The motion for summary judgment to amend nunc pro tuno notice of mechanic’s lien, and cross motion for summary judgment, all denied. Defendant’s motion to amend answer granted. Triable issues of fact in the pleadings and affidavits necessitate a trial. This court lacks jurisdiction to amend a notice of mechanic’s lien; such a motion must be made in a court with the power to foreclose the same since rights of parties not necessarily included, in this action may be affected. (UDCA, § 203.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 Misc. 2d 158, 278 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1967 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brickmasons-inc-v-bermark-construction-corp-nydistctnassau-1967.