Brickman v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

444 N.E.2d 979, 58 N.Y.2d 639, 458 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3887
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 16, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 444 N.E.2d 979 (Brickman v. F. W. Woolworth Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brickman v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 444 N.E.2d 979, 58 N.Y.2d 639, 458 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3887 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On defendant’s appeal: Order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Presiding Justice Francis T. Murphy, Jr., at the Appellate Division on the earlier appeal (66 AD2d 737-740).

On plaintiff’s appeal: Appeal dismissed, without costs, as academic in view of the disposition made on defendant’s appeal.

Concur: Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Chief Judge Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King David Associates v. Schonberger
255 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 N.E.2d 979, 58 N.Y.2d 639, 458 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brickman-v-f-w-woolworth-co-ny-1982.