Brickman v. American Bridge Fabricators, Inc.

124 A.2d 852, 1956 D.C. App. LEXIS 285
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 20, 1956·No. 1845·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was tried before a jury; the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the corporate defendant and for the plaintiff on the first count of the individual defendant’s counterclaim. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff both on his claim against the individual defendant and on the second count of the latter’s counterclaim.

Thereafter the individual defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial; the court, after argument of counsel, denied the motion for judgment but granted the motion for a new trial on all issues raised by the pleadings; an appropriate order was entered and the appeal is from that order.

The order of the court in granting the new trial is not a final order and is therefore not appealable. 1

Appeal dismissed.

1

. Students Book Co. v. Semerjian, D.C.Mun.App., 66 A.2d 487; Phillips v. Marvin’s Credit, Inc., D.C.Mun.App., 35 A.2d 825.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brickman v. American Bridge Fabricators, Inc., 124 A.2d 852, 1956 D.C. App. LEXIS 285 (D.C. 1956).

124 A.2d 852 (Brickman v. American Bridge Fabricators, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fisher v. Best
661 A.2d 1095 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)
Morfessis v. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co.
163 A.2d 825 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1960)