Brickman-Joy Corp. v. Tufano Contracting Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brickman-Joy Corp. v. Tufano Contracting Corp.

30 A.D.2d 832, 293 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3387

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 832 (Brickman-Joy Corp. v. Tufano Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brickman-Joy Corp. v. Tufano Contracting Corp., 30 A.D.2d 832, 293 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 1, 1967, reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion remitted to the Special Term for a hearing or for affidavits to be obtained or disclosure to be had as to what the records of the State Comp[833]*833troller’s office disclose with respect to the service of the summons and complaint herein, and' the office record thereof, and/or the filing in that office of a notice of pendency pursuant to' section 18 of the Lien Law. In our opinion the interests of justice require such further proceedings for the proper determination of the motions for summary judgment (CPLR 3212, subd. [f]). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 1, 1967, reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion remitted to the Special Term for a hearing or for affidavits to be obtained or disclosure to be had as to what the records of the State Comp[833]*833troller’s office disclose with respect to the service of the summons and complaint herein, and' the office record thereof, and/or the filing in that office of a notice of pendency pursuant to' section 18 of the Lien Law. In our opinion the interests of justice require such further proceedings for the proper determination of the motions for summary judgment (CPLR 3212, subd. [f]). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 832, 293 N.Y.S.2d 711, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brickman-joy-corp-v-tufano-contracting-corp-nyappdiv-1968.