Brickey v. Weinstein

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Brickey v. Weinstein

173 A.2d 372, 1961 D.C. App. LEXIS 312

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided August 17, 1961·No. No. 2759·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by a father from an order requiring him to make monthly payments for the support of his minor child who is living in Florida in the custody of her mother, appellant’s former wife. The order was entered pursuant to the provisions of our Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act. Code 1951, § 11-1601 et seq., Supp. VIII.

Review of the record convinces us that the order was proper and the amount awarded was within the discretionary limits of the trial court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by a father from an order requiring him to make monthly payments for the support of his minor child who is living in Florida in the custody of her mother, appellant’s former wife. The order was entered pursuant to the provisions of our Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act. Code 1951, § 11-1601 et seq., Supp. VIII.

Review of the record convinces us that the order was proper and the amount awarded was within the discretionary limits of the trial court.

Affirmed.

Brickey v. Weinstein, 173 A.2d 372, 1961 D.C. App. LEXIS 312 (D.C. 1961).

Pincite

173 A.2d 372 (Brickey v. Weinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.