Brickell Bay Club Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Forte

397 So. 2d 959
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 14, 1981
Docket79-2148
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 397 So. 2d 959 (Brickell Bay Club Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Forte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brickell Bay Club Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Forte, 397 So. 2d 959 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

397 So.2d 959 (1981)

BRICKELL BAY CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant/Cross Appellee,
v.
Michael FORTE et al., Appellees/Cross Appellants.

No. 79-2148.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 14, 1981.
Rehearing Denied May 20, 1981.

*960 Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik and Paul E. Gifford and Paul A. Louis, Miami, for appellant/cross appellee.

Hall & Hauser and Richard F. O'Brien, III and Andrew C. Hall, Miami, for appellees/cross appellants.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Judge.

There is no merit whatever in the appellant, Brickell Bay Club Condominium Association, Inc.'s claims of error in the entry of judgment against it, after non-jury trial, in an action seeking rescission of two agreements between the association and the appellees. Consequently, we affirm as to the appeal.

By cross-appeal,[1] the appellees challenge the trial court's failure to award them reasonable attorney's fee and costs, notwithstanding a specific term of one of the pertinent contracts which stated

In connection with any litigation arising out of this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all costs incurred, including reasonable attorneys' fees.

The trial court apparently made its determination because the action had been brought in good faith and on fairly debatable grounds. This ruling was erroneous. The agreement which has been quoted gave those of the appellees who were parties to it, since they prevailed in the litigation below, a clear and unequivocal right to the recovery of both attorney's fees and costs.[2] The courts have no discretion to decline to enforce such an undertaking, any more than any other contractual provision. Ritter's Hotel, Inc. v. Sidebothom, 142 Fla. 171, 194 So. 322 (1940); Kendall East Estates, Inc. v. Banks, 386 So.2d 1245, 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Silver Blue Lake Apts., No. 3, Inc. v. Manson, 334 So.2d 48 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Accordingly, the cause is remanded for the sole purpose of determining the amounts of attorney's fees and costs to be awarded under the provision in question.[3]

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

NOTES

[1] See, Brickell Bay Club Condominium Association, Inc. v. Forte, 379 So.2d 1334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

[2] Absent the agreement, the court would have discretion to deny costs to either side in an equitable action like this. Wilhelm v. Adams, 102 Fla. 669, 136 So. 397 (1931); International Center of the Americas, Inc. v. Dade Fashions, Inc., 391 So.2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

[3] Consistent with this holding, we have granted the motion for attorney's fees on appeal and assessed the sum of $15,000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hinkley v. GOULD, COOKSEY, FENNELL
971 So. 2d 955 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Lashkajani v. Lashkajani
911 So. 2d 1154 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Roberts v. Row
743 So. 2d 1145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Nunez v. Fernandez
724 So. 2d 182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
OAKLAND EAST MANORS CONDO. v. La Roza
669 So. 2d 1138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
MAISON GRANDE CONDO. ASS'N, INC. v. Dorten, Inc.
580 So. 2d 859 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Kassier v. Kipnis
571 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cacciagrani v. Gruher
567 So. 2d 898 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Lakewood On Green Villas Ass'n v. Pomerantz
556 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Sybert v. Combs
555 So. 2d 1313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Tropical Resources, Inc. v. Koger
524 So. 2d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Berryer v. Hertz
522 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Campbell v. A.B. Taff & Sons, Inc.
519 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Bittner v. Geier
513 So. 2d 717 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Garvin v. Squiers
502 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Daniels v. Arthur Johannessen, Inc.
496 So. 2d 914 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
BLUE LAKES APT. v. George Gowing, Inc.
464 So. 2d 705 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 So. 2d 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brickell-bay-club-condominium-assn-inc-v-forte-fladistctapp-1981.