Brick v. Favilla
118 A.D. 919, 103 N.Y.S. 1117
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 118 A.D. 919 (Brick v. Favilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brick v. Favilla, 118 A.D. 919, 103 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that the undisputed proof shows that plaintiff was entitled to recover for thirteen days’ rent; that the verdict of “no cause of action” was unauthorized and the judgment entered thereto was properly reversed by the County Court. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cohen v. Werner
82 Misc. 2d 295 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
118 A.D. 919, 103 N.Y.S. 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brick-v-favilla-nyappdiv-1907.