Brick v. Favilla
118 A.D. 919, 103 N.Y.S. 1117
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that the undisputed proof shows that plaintiff was entitled to recover for thirteen days’ rent; that the verdict of “no cause of action” was unauthorized and the judgment entered thereto was properly reversed by the County Court. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brick v. Favilla, 118 A.D. 919, 103 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
118 A.D. 919 (Brick v. Favilla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cohen v. Werner
82 Misc. 2d 295 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)