Brice v. State
770 So. 2d 740, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14630, 2000 WL 1671444
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 8, 2000
DocketNo. 4D00-2039
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 770 So. 2d 740 (Brice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brice v. State, 770 So. 2d 740, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14630, 2000 WL 1671444 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
Appellant appeals from an order amending his sentence entered after he successfully moved for post-conviction relief under Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The state concedes that the trial court erred by re-sentencing him in absentia. See State v. Scott, 439 So.2d 219 (Fla.1983). We, therefore, reverse and remand for re-sentencing.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Leslie v. State
920 So. 2d 710 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Barcelo v. State
774 So. 2d 895 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
770 So. 2d 740, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14630, 2000 WL 1671444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brice-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.