Brice v. Lane

15 S.E. 823, 90 Ga. 294
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 27, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 15 S.E. 823 (Brice v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brice v. Lane, 15 S.E. 823, 90 Ga. 294 (Ga. 1892).

Opinion

[295]*295 Judgment reversed.

J. G. McCall, by D. W. Rountree, for plaintiff in error. W. C. McCall and W. S. Humphreys, by brief, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Parks
174 S.E. 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Lewis v. King
141 S.E. 909 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Lovett v. Faircloth
10 F.2d 301 (Fifth Circuit, 1925)
McCrimmon v. National Bank
105 S.E. 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Tremere v. Barfield
78 S.E. 729 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Ward v. Lord
28 S.E. 446 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Walker v. Bank of Quitman
26 S.E. 84 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Pirkle v. Equitable Mortgage Co.
28 S.E. 34 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Holliday v. Lowry Banking Co.
92 Ga. 675 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 S.E. 823, 90 Ga. 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brice-v-lane-ga-1892.