Brice Blankenship v. the State of Texas
This text of Brice Blankenship v. the State of Texas (Brice Blankenship v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Abatement Order filed May 5, 2022
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-21-00714-CR ____________
BRICE BLANKENSHIP, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 506th Judicial District Court Waller County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 16-05-15629
ABATEMENT ORDER
The trial court appointed Zach Coufal to represent appellant on appeal. After the appointment, appellant retained Randy Schaffer to represent him. On April 14, 2022, Schaffer filed a motion to substitute as counsel.
An appointed attorney shall represent the defendant until
. . . charges are dismissed, the defendant is acquitted, appeals are exhausted, or the attorney is permitted or ordered by the court to withdraw as counsel for the defendant after a finding of good cause is entered on the record. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(j)(2).
Accordingly, we ABATE this appeal and order as follows: 1. The judge of the 506th Judicial District Court shall consider Schaffer’s request to substitute and shall determine whether appellant wishes to be represented by Schaffer as retained counsel or whether appellant wishes and is entitled to appointed counsel.
2. The judge shall see that a record of any hearing is made. The court reporter is directed to prepare, certify, and file with the clerk of this court a reporter’s record of the hearing. The trial clerk is directed to prepare, certify, and file with the clerk of this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing any orders regarding Schaffer’s request to substitute. The reporter’s record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with this court by June 6, 2022.
3. We will hold Schaffer’s motion to substitute pending receipt of the requested records.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket after the requested records are filed in this court.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Spain and Bourliot.
Panel Consists of Justices Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Spain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brice Blankenship v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brice-blankenship-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.