Briarton v. Gillette

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Briarton v. Gillette

22 A.D.2d 1008, 254 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2679

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 1008 (Briarton v. Gillette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Briarton v. Gillette, 22 A.D.2d 1008, 254 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to place case on the January 1965 Calendar denied. Memorandum: This case is now on the December Calendar. The attorney for the appellants has agreed to submit the ease upon his brief without oral argument if the ease remains on the December Calendar. The Assistant Corporation Counsel in charge of the ease says he cannot argue at that term. If the Corporation Counsel’s office cannot produce an attorney to argue the ease in its regular order, it shall be deemed submitted upon the briefs of both parties without oral argument. If a member of the Corporation Counsel’s office will be present to argue, then the appellants may also argue. In any event the case shall, remain on the December Calendar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to place case on the January 1965 Calendar denied. Memorandum: This case is now on the December Calendar. The attorney for the appellants has agreed to submit the ease upon his brief without oral argument if the ease remains on the December Calendar. The Assistant Corporation Counsel in charge of the ease says he cannot argue at that term. If the Corporation Counsel’s office cannot produce an attorney to argue the ease in its regular order, it shall be deemed submitted upon the briefs of both parties without oral argument. If a member of the Corporation Counsel’s office will be present to argue, then the appellants may also argue. In any event the case shall, remain on the December Calendar.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 1008, 254 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briarton-v-gillette-nyappdiv-1964.