Briane Moss v. State
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-18-00437-CR
BRIANE MOSS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 364th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016-408,577, Honorable William R. Eichman II, Presiding
August 6, 2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.
Appellant, Briane Moss, appeals the trial court’s judgment revoking her deferred
adjudication community supervision and adjudicating her guilty of the offense of evading
arrest using a vehicle.1 The trial court sentenced appellant to ten years’ confinement, but
suspended the sentence in favor of community supervision for five years. We abate the
appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.
1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04(b)(2)(A) (West 2016). We previously remanded this cause to the trial court on June 25, 2019, after
appellant’s retained counsel, Mr. Charles Blevins, failed to timely file an appellate brief.
Upon remand, the trial court was to determine, among other things: (1) whether appellant
still desired to prosecute the appeal; (2) whether appellant’s counsel had abandoned the
appeal; (3) whether appellant was denied the effective assistance of counsel; and (4)
whether appellant is indigent and entitled to the appointment of new counsel. After a
hearing on the matter on July 24, 2019, the trial court entered findings of fact and
conclusions of law. The trial court concluded that appellant still desired to prosecute the
appeal, that her counsel had not abandoned the appeal, and that she had not been denied
the effective assistance of counsel. The trial court permitted Mr. Blevins to continue to
represent appellant on appeal and directed him to file appellant’s brief by July 26, 2019.
The appeal was subsequently reinstated on the Court’s docket. By letter of July
25, 2019, the clerk of this Court notified Mr. Blevins that appellant’s brief was due on July
26. However, to date, counsel has not filed a brief or had any further communication with
this Court.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court is directed to
determine the following:
1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether appellant is indigent;
3. whether appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
4. whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel; and
2 5. whether new counsel should be appointed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by September 5,
2019. If it is determined that appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent,
and has been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint her
new counsel; the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of
any newly-appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings. Should
further time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before
September 5, 2019.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Briane Moss v. State (Briane Moss v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.