Brian West v. United States Department of the Army

73 F.3d 374, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6613, 1996 WL 5555
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 1996
Docket95-1236
StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 374 (Brian West v. United States Department of the Army) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brian West v. United States Department of the Army, 73 F.3d 374, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6613, 1996 WL 5555 (10th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

73 F.3d 374

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Brian WEST, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-1236.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 8, 1996.

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

The parties have agreed that this case may be submitted for decision on the briefs. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.2. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

We AFFIRM the district court's dismissal for the reasons given by the district court in adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F.3d 374, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6613, 1996 WL 5555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brian-west-v-united-states-department-of-the-army-ca10-1996.