Brian Wayne Allen v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 9, 2015·No. 01-15-00037-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS

Cause number: 01-15-00037-CR Style: Brian Wayne Allen v. State of Texas Date motions filed*: July 8, 2015 Type of motions: Motion for Substitution of Counsel and to File a Supplemental Brief Parties filing motions: Appellant’s new counsel Bryan Laine Document to be filed: Appellant’s Supplemental Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: April 13, 2015 Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due Date: June 15, 2015 Date Requested: N/A (45 days requested)

Ordered that motions are:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due: August 24, 2015.  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The motion to substitute counsel is granted, but construed as a notice of appearance, and the Clerk of this Court is directed to note Bryan Laine’s appearance as lead counsel for appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.2, 6.5(d). However, if counsel Christine Brown-Zeto requests withdrawal, she must file a motion that complies with Rule 6.5(d). Appellant’s motion for a 45-day extension of time to file a supplemental brief is granted until August 24, 2015, but no further extensions will be granted given the length of time requested. See id. at 38.7. Appellee’s brief, if any, will be due within 30 days of the filing of the supplemental brief. See id. at 38.6(b).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley 

Date: July 9, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brian Wayne Allen v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Brian Wayne Allen v. State (Brian Wayne Allen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.