Brian Madge v. United States

Opinion

_____________

No. 95-2674MN

_____________

Brian Madge, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

United States of America; * Darryl Williams, *

*

Appellees. *

_______________________ *

*

Darlow T. Madge, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

United States of America; * Darryl Williams, * * Appeal from the United States Appellees. * District Court for the District _______________________ * of Minnesota.

*

Darlow T. Madge, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Internal Revenue Service; * Darryl Williams, *

*

Appellees. *

_______________________ *

*

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Roger Vold; Lynne Leger, *

*

Appellants, *

*

Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance * Company, *

*

Defendant. *

_______________________ *

*

In Re: Search Warrants for * 875 Forest Arms Lane, Orono, * MN 55364; 3032 Colfax Avenue, * South, Minneapolis, MN 55408 *

*

Darlow T. Madge; Brian A. Madge,*

*

Appellants. *

_____________

Submitted: March 7, 1996

Filed: March 11, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Brian Madge, Darlow T. Madge, Roger Vold, and Lynne Leger appeal the district court's rulings denying the Madges' motion to return seized property and petitions to quash Internal Revenue Service summonses, and granting the government's petition to enforce summonses. Having carefully considered the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the controlling legal principles are well established and the issues do not warrant a comprehensive opinion. The appellants' arguments challenging the district court's jurisdiction are without merit. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 7402, 7604, 7609; Denison v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,. 751 F.2d 241, 242 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam); United States v. Claes, 747 F.2d 491, 494 (8th Cir. 1984). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

3

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.