Brian Lauer v. State of Arkansas
This text of 2020 Ark. App. 380 (Brian Lauer v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 380 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Date: 2021-07-08 09:34:24 Foxit PhantomPDF Version: DIVISION IV 9.7.5 No. CR-20-56
Opinion Delivered: September 9, 2020 BRIAN LAUER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE MILLER V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 46CR-18-278] STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE HONORABLE KIRK JOHNSON, JUDGE
SUPPLEMENTATION OF RECORD AND ADDENDUM ORDERED
BART F. VIRDEN, Judge
On April 30, 2018, Lauer entered a plea of guilty to second-degree battery. Lauer
was sentenced to six years’ probation, and he was ordered to pay fines, costs, and restitution
totaling $1600 and to have no contact with the victim. On October 30, 2018, the State filed
a petition to revoke Lauer’s probation because Lauer failed to pay his court-ordered costs,
fees, and restitution, failed to report to his probation officer, and failed to report a change
of address. On April 2, 2019, Lauer’s probation was, after revocation, reinstated with a sixty-
day jail sanction. We remand to settle the record and supplement the addendum.
Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires that the addendum to Lauer’s brief
include all documents essential to the appellate court’s resolution of the issues on appeal. See
Dees v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 85. Lauer has failed to include the original sentencing order
in both the record and the addendum; thus, we remand to the circuit court for settlement and supplementation of the record with the necessary order, to be completed within thirty
days. Within fifteen days of filing the supplemental record, Lauer shall file a substituted
abstract, addendum, and brief. See Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (stating that a party who files
a deficient brief is allowed an opportunity to file a conforming brief). If Lauer fails to do so,
the judgment and conviction he now appeals may be affirmed for noncompliance with Rule
4-2. Id. Should Lauer file a substituted abstract, brief, and addendum, the State may revise
or supplement its brief within fifteen days of the filing of Lauer’s brief or may rely on its
previously filed brief. Id. We encourage Lauer to review Rule 4-2 of the Rules of the
Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals to ensure that the substituted brief complies
with the rules and that no additional deficiencies are present.
Supplementation of record and addendum ordered.
HARRISON and BROWN, JJ., agree.
Phillip A. McGough, P.A., by: Phillip A. McGough, for appellant.
One brief only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 Ark. App. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brian-lauer-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2020.