Brian Lauer v. State of Arkansas

2020 Ark. App. 380
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 9, 2020
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2020 Ark. App. 380 (Brian Lauer v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brian Lauer v. State of Arkansas, 2020 Ark. App. 380 (Ark. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Cite as 2020 Ark. App. 380 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Date: 2021-07-08 09:34:24 Foxit PhantomPDF Version: DIVISION IV 9.7.5 No. CR-20-56

Opinion Delivered: September 9, 2020 BRIAN LAUER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE MILLER V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 46CR-18-278] STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE HONORABLE KIRK JOHNSON, JUDGE

SUPPLEMENTATION OF RECORD AND ADDENDUM ORDERED

BART F. VIRDEN, Judge

On April 30, 2018, Lauer entered a plea of guilty to second-degree battery. Lauer

was sentenced to six years’ probation, and he was ordered to pay fines, costs, and restitution

totaling $1600 and to have no contact with the victim. On October 30, 2018, the State filed

a petition to revoke Lauer’s probation because Lauer failed to pay his court-ordered costs,

fees, and restitution, failed to report to his probation officer, and failed to report a change

of address. On April 2, 2019, Lauer’s probation was, after revocation, reinstated with a sixty-

day jail sanction. We remand to settle the record and supplement the addendum.

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8) requires that the addendum to Lauer’s brief

include all documents essential to the appellate court’s resolution of the issues on appeal. See

Dees v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 85. Lauer has failed to include the original sentencing order

in both the record and the addendum; thus, we remand to the circuit court for settlement and supplementation of the record with the necessary order, to be completed within thirty

days. Within fifteen days of filing the supplemental record, Lauer shall file a substituted

abstract, addendum, and brief. See Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (stating that a party who files

a deficient brief is allowed an opportunity to file a conforming brief). If Lauer fails to do so,

the judgment and conviction he now appeals may be affirmed for noncompliance with Rule

4-2. Id. Should Lauer file a substituted abstract, brief, and addendum, the State may revise

or supplement its brief within fifteen days of the filing of Lauer’s brief or may rely on its

previously filed brief. Id. We encourage Lauer to review Rule 4-2 of the Rules of the

Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals to ensure that the substituted brief complies

with the rules and that no additional deficiencies are present.

Supplementation of record and addendum ordered.

HARRISON and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Phillip A. McGough, P.A., by: Phillip A. McGough, for appellant.

One brief only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brian Lauer v. State of Arkansas
2021 Ark. App. 135 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 Ark. App. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brian-lauer-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2020.