Brian Kuei Tung v. the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 10, 2025
Docket3D2023-0887
StatusPublished

This text of Brian Kuei Tung v. the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago (Brian Kuei Tung v. the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brian Kuei Tung v. the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed September 10, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-887 Lower Tribunal No. 04-11813 ________________

Brian Kuei Tung, et al., Appellants,

vs.

The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.

Law Office of Michael Garcia Petit, P.A., and Michael Garcia Petit (Miramar), for appellants.

White & Case LLP, and Raoul G. Cantero and James N. Robinson and Ryan A. Ulloa and Wyatt R. Smith (New York, NY), for appellees.

Before LOGUE, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Brian Kuei Tung is unable to obtain review for most of the issues he presents on appeal because his pleadings were struck before trial

as a sanction for his personal failure to comply with court orders to submit to

a deposition. Tung v. Republic of Trinidad & Tobago, 314 So. 3d 603 (Fla.

3d DCA 2020). Appellant Raul Gutierrez waived many of the points he raises

on appeal by failing to raise them in opposing summary judgment.

Desvarieux v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC, 300 So. 3d 723, 729 (Fla.

3d DCA 2020) (party failed to preserve issue for review as he never

mentioned the claim in his response to the opposing party's motion for

summary judgment). The remaining issues raised we affirm without

discussion.

Affirmed.

GORDO, J., concurs.

2 Tung v. Republic of Trinidad and Tobago Case No. 3D23-0887

LOGUE, J., concurring

I concur for the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Ferguson

v. Republic of Trinidad & Tobago, No. 3D23-0880 (Fla. 3d DCA Sept. 10,

2025).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brian Kuei Tung v. the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brian-kuei-tung-v-the-republic-of-trinidad-and-tobago-fladistctapp-2025.