Brian Keith Wallace v. Commonwealth of Virginia Lawrence D. Wilder, Governor Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General Unknown Assistant Attorneys to the Attorney General Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections Clarence Jackson, Jr., Chairman, Virginia Parole Board Virginia Parole Board, It's Members and Unknown Examiners E. L. Pearson, Warden St. Brides Correctional Center and Treatment Program Supervisor St. Brides Correctional Center Unknown Inmates Counselors Assigned to St. Brides Correctional Center Alton Baskerville, Warden Deep Meadow Correctional Center Bill Iverson, Treatment Program Supervisor

966 F.2d 1446, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22176

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 2, 1992
• Docket: 92-6214
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

966 F.2d 1446

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Brian Keith WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; Lawrence D. Wilder, Governor;
Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General; Unknown Assistant
Attorneys To the Attorney General Edward W. Murray,
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; Clarence
Jackson, JR., Chairman, Virginia Parole Board; Virginia
Parole Board, it's members, et al and unknown examiners; E.
L. Pearson, Warden; St. Brides Correctional Center And
Treatment Program Supervisor; St. Brides Correctional
Center; Unknown Inmates Counselors Assigned to St. Brides
Correctional Center; Alton Baskerville, Warden; Deep
Meadow Correctional Center; Bill Iverson, Treatment Program
Supervisor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6214.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 28, 1992
Decided: July 2, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-152-N)

Brian Keith Wallace, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Brian Keith Wallace appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint as frivolous within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wallace v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-92-152-N (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED