Brian Keith Carsten v. State of Florida
This text of Brian Keith Carsten v. State of Florida (Brian Keith Carsten v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D21-1623 _____________________________
BRIAN KEITH CARSTEN,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.
September 2, 2021
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks belated appeal of a July 27, 2020, order denying a postconviction motion. Because Petitioner’s motion for rehearing was not timely filed, it did not delay rendition of the July 27, 2020, order. See Fla. R. Crim. Pro. 3.850(j). Accordingly, the Court denies the petition for belated appeal on the merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that “clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits” is deemed a decision “which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel”).
LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Brian Keith Carsten, pro se, Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brian Keith Carsten v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brian-keith-carsten-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.