Brian Fellers v. State
This text of Brian Fellers v. State (Brian Fellers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-09-00535-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE WILLIAM HAYES WYTTENBACH
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Benavides, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
Relator, William Hayes Wyttenbach, pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in
the above cause on September 22, 2009. The Court, having examined and fully
considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown
himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is
DENIED. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 1st day of October, 2009.
1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brian Fellers v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brian-fellers-v-state-texapp-2009.