Brian Collins v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.

CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 2020
Docket19-0425
StatusPublished

This text of Brian Collins v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. (Brian Collins v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brian Collins v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., (W. Va. 2020).

Opinion

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

BRIAN A. COLLINS, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner September 15, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS vs.) No. 19-0425 (BOR Appeal No. 2053721) OF WEST VIRGINIA (Claim No. 20160054411)

ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., Employer Below, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner Brian A. Collins, by Counsel Reginald D. Henry, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review (“Board of Review”). Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., by Counsel H. Toney Stroud, filed a timely response.

The issue on appeal is entitlement to temporary total disability benefits. On February 28, 2018, the claims administrator issued an Order closing the claim for temporary total disability benefits. On April 14, 2018, the claims administrator issued another Order closing the claim for temporary total disability benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges (“Office of Judges”) affirmed both Orders on December 7, 2018. This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Order dated April 3, 2019, in which the Board of Review affirmed the December 7, 2018, Order of the Office of Judges.

This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Mr. Collins filed an application for benefits on August 21, 2015, after sustaining a foot injury while working as a mine foreman for Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. He sought treatment at MedExpress Urgent Care. An examination by Tommy Holbrook, D.O., showed abnormal range of motion during flexion, extension, inversion and eversion of the ankle as well as swelling of the ankle. The left lateral malleolus was tender to palpation. The assessment was sprain of an unspecified ligament of the left ankle. Mr. Collins was unable to work, and the anticipated return to work was established as August 25, 2015. He returned to Dr. Holbrook on August 29, 2015, 1 for a follow-up examination. Mr. Collins complained of constant pain and reported that he could not bend the last three toes on his left foot. On September 1, 2015, the claims administrator entered an Order rejecting the claim. Mr. Collins protested the claims administrator’s decision to reject his claim. In a Decision dated November 1, 2015, the Office of Judges reversed the September 1, 2015, claims administrator Order rejecting the claim. The Office of Judges ordered that the claim be held compensable for the condition of a sprain of unspecified ligament of the left ankle.

Mr. Collins underwent a left ankle MRI on September 3, 2015. The MRI revealed the following: “1. Tendinopathy of the peroneus longus. Early split tear in the inframalleolar portion; 2. Tendinopathy of the peroneus brevis; 3. Sinus tarsus ligaments are well seen; 4. Contusion of the medial malleolus, medial aspect of the talus, medial aspect of the navicular, and the sustentaculum talus; 5. Chronic fibrosis of the Achilles.” A second MRI performed on May 1, 2017, revealed marked improvement in appearance of the anterior talofibular ligament and the calcaneofibular ligament. The partial thickness tear of the peroneus longus was stable in location and size compared to the prior study. Mr. Collins was eventually diagnosed with a partial thickness tear of the peroneus longus and surgery was performed by Dr. Gosselink to repair the tear on July 21, 2017. The preoperative and postoperative diagnoses were peroneus longus tendon tear of the left ankle and left lateral ankle instability.

By letter dated February 8, 2017, Mr. Collins requested temporary total disability benefits from August 21, 2015, through October 18, 2015. The claims administrator denied the request for temporary total disability benefits on April 26, 2017. Mr. Collins protested the decision which denied his request for temporary total disability benefits from August 21, 2015, through October 18, 2015. However, he was subsequently granted temporary total disability benefits from January 4, 2018, through March 6, 2018.

Mr. Collins was treated by Dr. Gosselink on January 23, 2018, for a follow-up examination for his ankle. Dr. Gosselink reported that his condition had improved. However, Dr. Gosselink noted that Mr. Collins had an incident in physical therapy where he felt a pop on the lateral aspect of the ankle and had three to four days of increased pain and swelling. The impression was left ankle sprain and disorder of left ankle ligaments. Mr. Collins was to continue with physical therapy for an additional six weeks. Dr. Gosselink believed that he was still unable to perform full duty work, and he was referred to a work hardening program. Dr. Gosselink stated that he could return to work and progress to full duty as tolerated.

By Decision of the Office of Judges dated February 8, 2018, the claims administrator’s May 3, 2017, Order denying the request for temporary total disability benefits for the period of August 21, 2015, through October 18, 2015, was affirmed. The Office of Judges based its decision upon the preponderance of the evidence showing that Mr. Collins was not working due to voluntarily leaving his employment with Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., and not because of the injury he sustained on August 21, 2015.

The claims administrator, in a letter dated February 8, 2018, notified Mr. Collins that his temporary total disability benefits would be suspended if he did not provide the required information to demonstrate his continued eligibility for temporary total disability benefits. On 2 February 28, 2018, the claims administrator entered an Order closing the claim for temporary total disability benefits on the basis that Mr. Collins did not submit the required information and due to the decision by the Office of Judges dated February 8, 2018, affirming the denial of temporary total disability benefits. Mr. Collins protested the claims administrator’s Order.

Mr. Collins had a follow-up with Dr. Gosselink on March 6, 2018. Although he had a small setback in therapy where he had an episode of his ankle popping and swelling, Mr. Collins reported that he was doing a lot better. Dr. Gosselink referred him to two additional weeks of physical therapy and a functional capacity evaluation was recommended. If his condition did not improve, he would be referred to a work hardening program. Dr. Gosselink found that Mr. Collins could return to work as tolerated.

Mr. Collins underwent a functional capacity evaluation on March 13, 2018. He demonstrated the ability to perform 74.9% of the physical demands of his job as a foreman. The report stated that Mr. Collins put forth full effort during the evaluation. He demonstrated the ability to perform within the medium physical demand category, which matches his job’s demand category as a foreman. On that same date, Mr. Collins was treated by Dr. Gosselink for a follow- up examination for his foot and ankle. Dr. Gosselink reported that Mr. Collins is doing better but continues to have some pain with certain movements, particularly when going up on his toes or squatting. Dr. Gosselink recommended a work hardening program, and a work note was created stating that he should not twist/bend or squat/kneel.

On March 27, 2018, Mr. Collins was examined for an independent medical evaluation by Joseph Grady II, M.D., who assessed Mr. Collins with status post repair of peroneus longus tendon tear and anchoring of the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments. Dr. Grady stated that he had reached maximum medical improvement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 23-4-7
West Virginia § 23-4-7(a)(e)(4)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brian Collins v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brian-collins-v-alpha-natural-resources-inc-wva-2020.