Brian Anthony Preciado v. State
This text of Brian Anthony Preciado v. State (Brian Anthony Preciado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 06-16-00081-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS No. 06-16-00081-CR 7/1/2016 1:31:50 PM DEBBIE AUTREY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FILED IN SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 7/1/2016 1:31:50 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk BRIAN ANTHONY PRECIADO, Appellant
VS.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
APPEALED FROM THE 71ST DISTRICT COURT
HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NO. 11-0045X
STATE’S BRIEF
COKE SOLOMON CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS P.O. BOX 776 MARSHALL, TEXAS 75671 (903) 935-4840
BY: LAURA M. CARPENTER ASSISTANT CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY BAR #08618050 ATTORNEY FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
Oral Argument is Not Requested No. 06-16-00081-CR
BRIAN ANTHONY PRECIADO, Appellant
__________________________________________
NAMES OF ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS __________________________________________
The names and identifying information of all parties and attorneys were correctly
stated in Appellant’s brief.
ii TABLE OF CONTENTS
NAMES OF ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS ............................................................... ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………………..iii
STATEMENT OF THE CASE .......................................................................................... 1
STATEMENT OF FACTS ................................................................................................ 1
STATE’S REPLY . ........................................................................................................... 1
PRAYER ......................................................................................................................... 1
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE…………………………………………………………….2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .......................................................................................... 2
iii STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The State of Texas adopts Appellant’s recitation of his Statement of the Case
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The State of Texas adopts Appellant’s recitation of his Statement of Facts
STATE’S REPLY TO APPELLANT’S ISSUE
The trial court did err in assessing payment of court appointed counsel fees
against the appellant, an indigent person. Appellee agrees with Appellant that the trial
court judgment should be modified to delete the assessment of court appointed counsel
fees.
PRAYER
Appellee respectfully prays this Court modify the judgment to delete the
assessment of court appointed counsel fees.
Respectfully Submitted Coke Solomon Criminal District Attorney Harrison County, Texas
By: /s/ Laura M. Carpenter Laura M. Carpenter, Assistant District Attorney Bar Card #08618050
1 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify that this brief contains 336 words according to the computer program used to prepare the document.
/s/ Laura M. Carpenter Laura M. Carpenter
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellee’s Brief has been faxed to the attorney for Appellant, Ebb Mobley, this 1st day of July, 2016, by e-file.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brian Anthony Preciado v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brian-anthony-preciado-v-state-texapp-2016.