Brian Anthony Preciado v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 1, 2016·No. 06-16-00081-CR·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED

06-16-00081-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

No. 06-16-00081-CR 7/1/2016 1:31:50 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

FILED IN

SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS

7/1/2016 1:31:50 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

Clerk

BRIAN ANTHONY PRECIADO, Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

APPEALED FROM THE 71ST DISTRICT COURT HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 11-0045X

STATE’S BRIEF

COKE SOLOMON

CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY HARRISON COUNTY, TEXAS

P.O. BOX 776

MARSHALL, TEXAS 75671

(903) 935-4840

BY: LAURA M. CARPENTER ASSISTANT CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY BAR #08618050

ATTORNEY FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS

Oral Argument is Not Requested

No. 06-16-00081-CR

BRIAN ANTHONY PRECIADO, Appellant VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

NAMES OF ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS

The names and identifying information of all parties and attorneys were correctly stated in Appellant’s brief.

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NAMES OF ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS ............................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………………..iii STATEMENT OF THE CASE .......................................................................................... 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS ................................................................................................ 1 STATE’S REPLY . ........................................................................................................... 1 PRAYER ......................................................................................................................... 1 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE…………………………………………………………….2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .......................................................................................... 2

iii

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The State of Texas adopts Appellant’s recitation of his Statement of the Case

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The State of Texas adopts Appellant’s recitation of his Statement of Facts

STATE’S REPLY TO APPELLANT’S ISSUE

The trial court did err in assessing payment of court appointed counsel fees against the appellant, an indigent person. Appellee agrees with Appellant that the trial court judgment should be modified to delete the assessment of court appointed counsel fees.

PRAYER

Appellee respectfully prays this Court modify the judgment to delete the assessment of court appointed counsel fees.

Respectfully Submitted

Coke Solomon

Criminal District Attorney Harrison County, Texas

By: /s/ Laura M. Carpenter Laura M. Carpenter,

Assistant District Attorney Bar Card #08618050

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

I hereby certify that this brief contains 336 words according to the computer program used to prepare the document.

/s/ Laura M. Carpenter

Laura M. Carpenter

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellee’s Brief has been faxed to the attorney for Appellant, Ebb Mobley, this 1st day of July, 2016, by e-file.

/s/ Laura M. Carpenter

Laura M. Carpenter

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brian Anthony Preciado v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Brian Anthony Preciado v. State (Brian Anthony Preciado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.