Brezinski v. Island Medical Care

291 A.D.2d 366, 736 N.Y.S.2d 883, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1299
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 4, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 291 A.D.2d 366 (Brezinski v. Island Medical Care) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brezinski v. Island Medical Care, 291 A.D.2d 366, 736 N.Y.S.2d 883, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1299 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the defendants appeal from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), entered December 6, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, and upon the denial of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $785,785.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for [367]*367the wrongful death of her husband, John Brezinski, caused by the defendants’ medical malpractice. Although the jury found that the defendants were not negligent in failing to refer Brezinski to an emergency room immediately, it found that they were negligent in failing to perform an electrocardiogram.

The defendants contend that the verdict is internally inconsistent and, thus, against the weight of the evidence. However, the verdict was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence and should not be disturbed (see, Corcoran v People’s Ambulette Serv., 237 AD2d 402; cf., Steven Fine Assoc. v Serota, 273 AD2d 375). The jury apparently credited the testimony of the plaintiff’s expert that Brezinski would have lived had the defendants provided the appropriate medical care. The finding that the defendants were not negligent in failing to refer Brezinski to the emergency room has no bearing on the determination that the defendants were negligent in failing to perform an electrocardiogram. Goldstein, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Villanueva v. Ragins
50 A.D.3d 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
McGoldrick v. Licata
298 A.D.2d 439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Rivers v. St. Mary's Hospital
296 A.D.2d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Blanar v. Dickinson
296 A.D.2d 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
291 A.D.2d 366, 736 N.Y.S.2d 883, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brezinski-v-island-medical-care-nyappdiv-2002.