Breziner v. Point East Three Condominium Corp.

57 So. 3d 964, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4329, 2011 WL 1135287
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 2011·No. No. 3D10-3093·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lilian Breziner appeals the November 15, 2010, order of the trial court granting a motion to direct appellant to show cause and to compel appellant’s compliance with the court’s final summary judgment. We affirm because there is no basis on this record to conclude that the court committed reversible error in entering this order.

We understand that the appellant’s real concern is the enforcement of the judgment requiring her to remove her pet from her condominium unit, as the continued presence of the pet violates the rules of the condominium association. However, the final summary judgment requiring the removal of the pet was not appealed. We have no jui'isdiction to consider this issue. Robinson v. City of Tampa, 573 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Breziner v. Point East Three Condominium Corp., 57 So. 3d 964, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 4329, 2011 WL 1135287 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

57 So. 3d 964 (Breziner v. Point East Three Condominium Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. City of Tampa
573 So. 2d 1024 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)