Breytman v. Schechter

992 N.E.2d 1086, 21 N.Y.3d 974, 2013 NY Slip Op 77687, 970 N.Y.S.2d 743, 2013 WL 3185257, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 1660
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 25, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 992 N.E.2d 1086 (Breytman v. Schechter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Breytman v. Schechter, 992 N.E.2d 1086, 21 N.Y.3d 974, 2013 NY Slip Op 77687, 970 N.Y.S.2d 743, 2013 WL 3185257, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 1660 (N.Y. 2013).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR) § 500.22 (b) (2). Motion for poor person relief etc. dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
992 N.E.2d 1086, 21 N.Y.3d 974, 2013 NY Slip Op 77687, 970 N.Y.S.2d 743, 2013 WL 3185257, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 1660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breytman-v-schechter-ny-2013.