Breyan v. Ruth

699 F. App'x 198
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 2017
DocketNo. 17-6703, No. 17-6704, No. 17-6705, No. 17-6706
StatusPublished

This text of 699 F. App'x 198 (Breyan v. Ruth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Breyan v. Ruth, 699 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Michael Breyan challenges the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaints without prejudice for failure to comply with multiple court orders directing him to file his complaints on the proper provided forms. See Fed. R. Civ. P, 41(b). Having determined that these orders are final and appealable, see Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 807 F.3d 619, 624 (4th Cir. 2015), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Breyan v. Ruth, No. 2:17-cv-00110-BHH-MGB (D.S.C. Apr. 10, 2017); Breyan v. All; No. 2:17-cv-00111-BHH-MGB (D.S.C. Apr. 10, 2017); Breyan v. Poindexter, No. 2:17-cv-00210-BHH-MGB (D.S.C. Apr. 10, 2017); Breyan v. Classification, No. 2:17-cv-00664-BHH-MGB (D.S.C. Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freddie Goode v. Central Virginia Legal Aid Society
807 F.3d 619 (Fourth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 F. App'x 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/breyan-v-ruth-ca4-2017.