Brewton v. Brewton
This text of 30 Ga. 416 (Brewton v. Brewton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
This case turns really upon the proper construction of the complainants’ bill. The Judge, who sustained the demurrer to it, thought it claimed that gifts made by the testator to his children in his lifetime should be brought into hotch-pot, while counsel for the bill contend that it only asks that loans may be brought in. The bill was not wholly dismissed, (being retained for other purposes,) and if the complainants are really after loans and not gifts, it will be easy to make their bill sufficiently explicit by amendment. But as to bringing gifts into hotch-pot, we concur- with his Honor below, that it cannot be required when there is a will which does not require it. The law in relation to advancements has no application when there is a will. The will itself is then the law of distribution, and all that the testator leaves at his death must go according to the will.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Ga. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewton-v-brewton-ga-1860.