Brewster v. Wendt
This text of 242 A.D. 775 (Brewster v. Wendt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to vacate certiorari order and dismiss the proceeding affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. While the verification of the petition by the petitioner before his son, who is a member of the board of zoning appeals of the town of Islip and one of the appellants, is not to be commended, it was, in our opinion, at most a mere irregularity and did not render the petition void or deprive the court of jurisdiction of the proceeding. (Heidelberger v. Heidelberger, 196 App. Div. 626; Vreelandv. Pennsylvania Tanning Co., 130 id. 405.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewster-v-wendt-nyappdiv-1934.