Brewster v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Brewster v. State

165 S.W. 224, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 655

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 4, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 165 S.W. 224 (Brewster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brewster v. State, 165 S.W. 224, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 655 (Tex. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

This is a companion case to that of Roy Hahn, 165 S. W. 218, this day decided. Appellant in this case was convicted and his punishment assessed the same as said Hahn’s. The two cases and the testimony in each are as near identical as any two cases could be. There is no material difference one from tbd other.

There is no question raised in this that is not raised and decided in the Hahn Case. It is therefore unnecessary to further state or discuss any of the questions in this case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

This is a companion case to that of Roy Hahn, 165 S. W. 218, this day decided. Appellant in this case was convicted and his punishment assessed the same as said Hahn’s. The two cases and the testimony in each are as near identical as any two cases could be. There is no material difference one from tbd other.

There is no question raised in this that is not raised and decided in the Hahn Case. It is therefore unnecessary to further state or discuss any of the questions in this case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 S.W. 224, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewster-v-state-texcrimapp-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack