Brewster v. Skiba

22 A.D.3d 426, 805 N.Y.S.2d 4
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 27, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered July 26, 2004, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Even assuming that plaintiff satisfied his initial burden of proving a prima facie case of serious injury, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion on the ground that defendants did not have an opportunity to examine plaintiff by their own physicians (CPLR 3212 [f]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brewster v. Skiba, 22 A.D.3d 426, 805 N.Y.S.2d 4 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

22 A.D.3d 426 (Brewster v. Skiba) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cruz v. City of New York
2020 NY Slip Op 2887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)