Brewster v. Page

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Brewster v. Page

58 N.H. 4

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1876·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Sawyer, J.

The bill was properly dismissed, because, if the plaintiffs were entitled to relief, they had a suitable remedy at law on a motion for a discharge of the agreed case (Bellows v. Stone, 14 N. H. 175, 203; Lyme v. Allen, 51 N. H. 242); and in Page v. Brewster, 54 N. H. 184, 188, their motion for a discharge was denied.

Exceptions overruled.

Foster, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sawyer, J.

The bill was properly dismissed, because, if the plaintiffs were entitled to relief, they had a suitable remedy at law on a motion for a discharge of the agreed case (Bellows v. Stone, 14 N. H. 175, 203; Lyme v. Allen, 51 N. H. 242); and in Page v. Brewster, 54 N. H. 184, 188, their motion for a discharge was denied.

Exceptions overruled.

Foster, J., did not sit.

Brewster v. Page, 58 N.H. 4 (N.H. 1876).

Pincite

58 N.H. 4 (Brewster v. Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related