Brewster v. Entz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Brewster v. Entz

98 A. 1084, 86 N.J. Eq. 242, 1 Stock. 242, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 443

DecidedJune 19, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 98 A. 1084 (Brewster v. Entz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brewster v. Entz, 98 A. 1084, 86 N.J. Eq. 242, 1 Stock. 242, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 443 (N.J. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Griffin. By a slip of the pen, he is made to say that he will allow a decree setting aside the assignment. As the point of the opinion is that the assignment was a forgery, the language of the decree itself is correct in adjudging that the assignment is null and void.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohakd, Parker, Bergen, Mjnturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, White, Teri-iune, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The decree is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Griffin. By a slip of the pen, he is made to say that he will allow a decree setting aside the assignment. As the point of the opinion is that the assignment was a forgery, the language of the decree itself is correct in adjudging that the assignment is null and void.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohakd, Parker, Bergen, Mjnturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, White, Teri-iune, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 15.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 A. 1084, 86 N.J. Eq. 242, 1 Stock. 242, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewster-v-entz-nj-1916.