Brewster v. Dana

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Brewster v. Dana

1 Root 266

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMarch 15, 1791

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Root 266 (Brewster v. Dana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brewster v. Dana, 1 Root 266 (Colo. 1791).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The note set forth in the declaration is for West India goods generally; the note produced in evidence is for West India rum and sugar praticularly, and a recovery [268]*268for one would be no bar to an action for tbe other. 2d. A blank indorsement bas no certain import until filled up with something wrote over it, and is not evidence that the property of the note belonged to the plaintiff, or that said Q-ear had warranted it to him, which were material points in the case and which, the evidence failed essentially of proving.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The note set forth in the declaration is for West India goods generally; the note produced in evidence is for West India rum and sugar praticularly, and a recovery [268]*268for one would be no bar to an action for tbe other. 2d. A blank indorsement bas no certain import until filled up with something wrote over it, and is not evidence that the property of the note belonged to the plaintiff, or that said Q-ear had warranted it to him, which were material points in the case and which, the evidence failed essentially of proving.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewster-v-dana-conn-1791.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack