Brewster v. Colwell

13 Wend. 28
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1834·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The plaintiff in error insists that the trustees of a school district could not become the endorsees of a promissory note. The trustees are a corporation for certain purposes; they may do sundry acts which involve to some extent the transaction of monied concerns. They no doubt may receive, for money due to them, the note of a third person. Until the note was impeached, or some defence made against it, they were under no obligation to show how they came by it. The courts below decided correctly, and the judgment of the common pleas must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brewster v. Colwell, 13 Wend. 28 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

13 Wend. 28 (Brewster v. Colwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Wolf v. Watterson
42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 111 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Alger v. Miller
56 Barb. 227 (New York Supreme Court, 1868)
Commissioners of Highways v. Peck
5 Hill & Den. 215 (New York Supreme Court, 1843)