Brewster v. Cahill

Supreme Court

Brewster v. Cahill

194 U.S. 628, 24 S. Ct. 857, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 655

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 18, 1904

DocketNo. 216

StatusPublished

This text of 194 U.S. 628 (Brewster v. Cahill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brewster v. Cahill, 194 U.S. 628, 24 S. Ct. 857, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 655 (1904).

Pincite

Opinion

In error to the Supreme Court of [629]*629the State of Illinois. Submitted April 12, 1904. Decided April 18, 1904. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction nunc pro tunc as of April 7, 1904, on the .authority of Lehigh Water Company v. Easton, 121 U. S. 388; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112, and cases cited; Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127, 129; New Orleans Waterworks Company v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336. Mr. Fred F. Beers for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas N. Haskins for defendants in error..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In error to the Supreme Court of [629]*629the State of Illinois. Submitted April 12, 1904. Decided April 18, 1904. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction nunc pro tunc as of April 7, 1904, on the .authority of Lehigh Water Company v. Easton, 121 U. S. 388; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Central Land Company v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112, and cases cited; Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127, 129; New Orleans Waterworks Company v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336. Mr. Fred F. Beers for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas N. Haskins for defendants in error..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 U.S. 628, 24 S. Ct. 857, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewster-v-cahill-scotus-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack