Brewer v. Whitney

D.C. Circuit

Brewer v. Whitney

38 App. D.C. 273, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2120

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 1912

DocketNo. 679

StatusPublished

This text of 38 App. D.C. 273 (Brewer v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brewer v. Whitney, 38 App. D.C. 273, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2120 (D.C. Cir. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding. The invention in issue relates to a manifold sales book designed especially for use in restaurants and hotels.

Appellant William S. Brewer, is here with forty-two assignments of error, all relating to questions of fact pertinent to this case. To discuss these assignments in detail would involve great labor, with no precedent of value to the profession established. We have carefully reviewed the evidence, and have arrived at the conclusion that the Commissioner is right and should be affirmed, which is accordingly ordered. The clerk is directed to certify these proceedings as by law required.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding. The invention in issue relates to a manifold sales book designed especially for use in restaurants and hotels.

Appellant William S. Brewer, is here with forty-two assignments of error, all relating to questions of fact pertinent to this case. To discuss these assignments in detail would involve great labor, with no precedent of value to the profession established. We have carefully reviewed the evidence, and have arrived at the conclusion that the Commissioner is right and should be affirmed, which is accordingly ordered. The clerk is directed to certify these proceedings as by law required.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 App. D.C. 273, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-whitney-cadc-1912.