Brewer v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Brewer v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

221 A.2d 908, 243 Md. 703, 1966 Md. LEXIS 586

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided August 1, 1966·No. App. No. 109·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Despite petitioner’s failure to file his application for leave to appeal within 30 days as required by Code, Art. 27, § 645-1 (1957 Cum. Supp. 1965) and Maryland Rule BK 46 a, he has filed a motion that he be released because the state has failed to answer his application within 15 days. Maryland Rule BK 43, [704] which gives the State 15 days to respond to a petition for post conviction relief, has no bearing on the appeal procedure. The motion must, therefore, be denied and the application dismissed. Lucas v. Warden, 235 Md. 666, 202 A. 2d 604 (1964).

Application dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Despite petitioner’s failure to file his application for leave to appeal within 30 days as required by Code, Art. 27, § 645-1 (1957 Cum. Supp. 1965) and Maryland Rule BK 46 a, he has filed a motion that he be released because the state has failed to answer his application within 15 days. Maryland Rule BK 43, [704] which gives the State 15 days to respond to a petition for post conviction relief, has no bearing on the appeal procedure. The motion must, therefore, be denied and the application dismissed. Lucas v. Warden, 235 Md. 666, 202 A. 2d 604 (1964).

Application dismissed.

Brewer v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 221 A.2d 908, 243 Md. 703, 1966 Md. LEXIS 586 (Md. 1966).

Pincite

221 A.2d 908 (Brewer v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related