Brewer v. Tysor
50 N.C. 173
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brewer v. Tysor. Read the opinion of the Court — 48 N.C. 180 →
Opinion
This case as it is now presented, differs wholly from that of Brewer v. Tysor, 3 Jones’ Rep. 180. There the contract was entire ; here it is divided into three separate and distinct parts. There can be no reason why the plaintiffs should not recover for the work done on the two parts which were finished according to the contract. There is no error.
Per Curiam, Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brewer v. Tysor, 50 N.C. 173 (N.C. 1857).
50 N.C. 173 (Brewer v. Tysor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.