Brewer v. State

12 Tex. 248
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1854·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

It is reasonable to suppose that the Judge who presided at the trial, was quite as competent to decide whether the jury were sworn, as the persons whose testimony was proposed touching that question. We must presume that the fact, that the jury were sworn, was within the knowledge of the presiding Judge; and he might well refuse to hear the testimony of witnesses , offered to contradict the evidence of his senses. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brewer v. State, 12 Tex. 248 (Tex. 1854).

12 Tex. 248 (Brewer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ivy v. Ivy
112 S.W. 110 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Lockett v. Schurenberg
60 Tex. 610 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Bradford v. Mann
1 Posey 225 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1880)